When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: samsung a15 case australia government site

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Samsung Galaxy A15 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_A15

    The Samsung Galaxy A15 and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G are Android-based smartphones designed, developed and marketed by Samsung Electronics as a part of its Galaxy A series. They were announced on 11 December 2023, and released on the sixteenth of December less than a week later.

  3. Samsung Galaxy A series - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_A_series

    The Samsung Galaxy A series is a line of low-range to mid-range (and previously premium mid-range before 2022) Android smartphones and tablets manufactured by Samsung Electronics as part of their Galaxy line. The first models in the series were the first-generation Galaxy A3 and Galaxy A5, announced on October 31, 2014 and released in December ...

  4. Samsung Galaxy A51 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_A51

    The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an Android smartphone manufactured by Samsung Electronics as part of its Galaxy A series.It was announced and released in December 2019. The phone has a Super AMOLED FHD+ 6.5in display, a 48MP wide, 12 MP ultrawide, 5MP depth, and 5MP macro camera, a 4000mAh battery, and an optical in-screen fingerprint sensor.

  5. Samsung Galaxy A14 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_A14

    The Samsung Galaxy A14 is an Android smartphone designed and manufactured by Samsung Electronics.The 5G model was announced on January 4, 2023, [6] [7] [8] [9] and ...

  6. Samsung - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung

    In Australia during 2022, Australia's competition and consumer commission fined Samsung AU$14 million. The fine came due to misleading water resistance claims for over 3.1 million smartphones. The commission stated that during 2016–2018 the company advertised its Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5, A7, S8, S8 Plus and Note 8 devices as able to survive ...

  7. Australian Tape Manufacturers Association Ltd v Commonwealth

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Tape...

    The royalty imposed by the government was a special type of debt that did not satisfy the elements of taxation. McHugh J added that the term "public purpose" meant government purpose, and the fee imposed had no government purpose. The Commonwealth played a merely supervisory role.