When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hudson v. Palmer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Palmer

    Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prison inmates have no privacy rights in their cells protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  3. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    DeVillier v. Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [1] [2] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence.

  4. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Department_of...

    The Inclusive Communities Project is a Texas-based non-profit organization that helps low-income families obtain affordable housing. [5] In 2008, they filed suit against the Texas agency responsible for administering these tax credits, claiming it disproportionately allocated too many tax credits "in predominantly black inner-city areas and too ...

  5. Right to property - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_property

    The right to property, or the right to own property (cf. ownership), is often [how often?] classified as a human right for natural persons regarding their possessions.A general recognition of a right to private property is found [citation needed] more rarely and is typically heavily constrained insofar as property is owned by legal persons (i.e. corporations) and where it is used for ...

  6. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution provides that certain substantive rights such as life, liberty, and property, cannot be deprived except pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures. The categories of substance and procedure are distinct. Were the rule otherwise, the Clause would be reduced to a mere tautology ...

  7. Eminent domain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain

    The provisions relating to the right to property were changed a number of times. The 44th amendment of 1978 deleted the right to property from the list of Fundamental Rights. [14] A new article, Article 300-A, was added to the constitution to provide, "No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law."

  8. Coverture - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture

    The abolition of coverture has been seen as "one of the greatest extensions of property rights in human history", and one that led to a number of positive financial and economic impacts. Specifically, it led to shifts in household portfolios, a positive shock to the supply of credit, and a reallocation of labor towards non-agriculture and ...

  9. Due Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause

    McQuewan, 55 U.S. 539 (1852), so that Chief Justice Taney would not have been entirely breaking ground in his Dred Scott opinion when he pronounced the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional because, among other reasons, an "act of Congress that deprived a citizen of his liberty or property merely because he came himself or brought his property ...