When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Prefer secondary sourcesArticles should rely on secondary sources whenever possible. For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper.

  3. Wikipedia:Using sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Using_sources

    A third-party source from one article may be treated as an auxiliary source in another, because the focus has changed. [6] Generally, any source that does not qualify as a reliable third-party source is grouped in this category. The use of these raw, first-hand, or out-of-date sources lends itself to inaccurate reporting, undue weight, and ...

  4. Wikipedia : Primary Secondary and Tertiary Sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Primary...

    Secondary sources are accounts at least one step removed from an event or body of primary-source material and may include an interpretation, analysis, or synthetic claims about the subject. [2] Secondary sources may draw on primary sources and other secondary sources to create a general overview; or to make analytic or synthetic claims. [3] [4]

  5. Wikipedia:No original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

    Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources.

  6. Wikipedia : No original research/PSTS

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original...

    Needs a basic lead sentence here, like "Wikipedia editors often classify source material according to whether it is primary, secondary, or tertiary.". Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources.

  7. Wikipedia:Handling primary, secondary and tertiary sources ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Handling_primary...

    Whether a source is primary, secondary or tertiary can depend on the topic that an article is covering. For example, the summary for policy makers from the IPCC is a secondary source for the article Global warming but it would be a primary source if used for the article Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Similarly, a book review in a ...

  8. Wikipedia:Verifiability

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    This means a reliable published source must exist for it, whether or not it is cited in the article. Sources must support the material clearly and directly: drawing inferences from multiple sources to advance a novel position is prohibited by the NOR policy. [h] Base articles largely on reliable secondary sources.

  9. Wikipedia:Identifying primary and secondary sources for ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Tertiary sources are publications such as encyclopedias and other compendia that summarize primary and secondary sources. Wikipedia is a bad source. While it is a tertiary source, Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. Tertiary sources can provide a valuable overview of a topic, but often oversimplify complex ...

  1. Related searches is a secondary source reliable or valid article database is called a key

    wikipedia reliability of sourceswikipedia articles based on sources
    most reliable wikipedia articlesmost accurate wikipedia source