Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Some countries, like Canada and Germany, have limited the penalties for non-commercial copyright infringement. For example, Germany has passed a bill to limit the fine for individuals accused of sharing movies and series to €800–900.
Floor covering, [22] originally coined by Frederick Walton in 1864, and ruled as generic following a lawsuit for trademark infringement in 1878; probably the first product name to become a generic term. [23] Lyocell Originally a brand name owned by Lenzing, an austrian based company, for a viscose-type fiber fabricated via the NMMO process.
An intellectual property (IP) infringement is the infringement or violation of an intellectual property right. There are several types of intellectual property rights, such as copyrights , patents , trademarks , industrial designs , plant breeders rights [ 1 ] and trade secrets .
This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright. The use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia , hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation , of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as non-free use under the ...
The code you would insert on the image page to insert this tag is: {{Non-free logo}} An example of such an image page would be the Chevrolet "bowtie" logo image page. Image pages with the {{Non-free logo}} tag should also contain some additional (often lengthy) explanations known as a "non-free media use rationale" that justify their use on Wikipedia – this information is required because of ...
A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf; and; An electronic or physical signature (which may be a scanned copy) of the copyright owner. A complaint can be submitted by: Sending a letter to our registered copyright agent.
[1] [3] Under the doctrine of substantial similarity, a work can be found to infringe copyright even if the wording of text has been changed or visual or audible elements are altered. [4] Confusion arises because some courts use "substantial similarity" in two different contexts during a copyright infringement case. [5]
The Coca-Cola logo (the quintessential example of a trademarked but not copyrighted logo) is used on the Coca-Cola page, but not the Pepsi Cola page – so no trademark problems result. For Wikipedia purposes, a "public domain" image does not need a non-free content rationale in order to be used.