When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: miter wood clamps harbor freight

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miter clamp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miter_clamp

    [citation needed] The screws go under the frame (work-piece) to be held, and the bit clamps down on the lower-edge of the frame. [citation needed] Recent designs are more complicated; a rigid body holds one fixed and one moveable jaw activated by a cam. [citation needed] An example of newer clamps is Jim Chestnut's Clam Clamp. [8]

  3. Category:Woodworking clamps - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Woodworking_clamps

    Category: Woodworking clamps. ... Miter clamp; V. Vise; W. Woodworking vise This page was last edited on 11 November 2014, at 09:10 (UTC). Text is available under the ...

  4. Mitre box - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitre_box

    A mitre box or miter box (American English) is a wood working appliance used to guide a hand saw for making precise cuts, usually 45° mitre cuts. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Traditional mitre boxes are simple in construction and made of wood, while adjustable mitre boxes are made of metal and can be adjusted for cutting any angle from 45° to 90°.

  5. Miter joint - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miter_joint

    90º miter joint (pieces ready to be joined) Miter joint of two pipes A miter joint (mitre in British English) is a joint made by cutting each of two parts to be joined, across the main surface, usually at a 45° angle, to form a corner, usually to form a 90° angle, though it can comprise any angle greater than 0 degrees.

  6. Disston Saw Works - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disston_Saw_Works

    Two successor companies are said to still be around, Disston Precision is still operational in Philadelphia, [1] and Disston Tools in Chicopee, MA. [ 2 ] History

  7. Harbor Freight Tools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harbor_Freight_Tools

    Harbor Freight Tools won a declassification of the class action; that is, the court found that all the individual situations were not similar enough to be judged as a single class, and that their claims would require an individual-by-individual inquiry, so the case could not be handled on a class basis.