Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
When X n converges almost completely towards X then it also converges almost surely to X. In other words, if X n converges in probability to X sufficiently quickly (i.e. the above sequence of tail probabilities is summable for all ε > 0), then X n also converges almost surely to X. This is a direct implication from the Borel–Cantelli lemma.
This will obviously be also bounded and continuous, and therefore by the portmanteau lemma for sequence {X n} converging in distribution to X, we will have that E[g(X n)] → E[g(X)]. However the latter expression is equivalent to “E[ f ( X n , c )] → E[ f ( X , c )]”, and therefore we now know that ( X n , c ) converges in distribution ...
Convergence of random variables, for "almost sure convergence" With high probability; Cromwell's rule, which says that probabilities should almost never be set as zero or one; Degenerate distribution, for "almost surely constant" Infinite monkey theorem, a theorem using the aforementioned terms; List of mathematical jargon
It is equivalent to check condition (iii) for the series = = = (′) where for each , and ′ are IID—that is, to employ the assumption that [] =, since is a sequence of random variables bounded by 2, converging almost surely, and with () = ().
The continuous mapping theorem states that this will also be true if we replace the deterministic sequence {x n} with a sequence of random variables {X n}, and replace the standard notion of convergence of real numbers “→” with one of the types of convergence of random variables.
If is a stationary ergodic process, then () converges almost surely to = [] . The Glivenko–Cantelli theorem gives a stronger mode of convergence than this in the iid case. An even stronger uniform convergence result for the empirical distribution function is available in the form of an extended type of law of the iterated logarithm .
For a set of random variables X n and corresponding set of constants a n (both indexed by n, which need not be discrete), the notation = means that the set of values X n /a n converges to zero in probability as n approaches an appropriate limit. Equivalently, X n = o p (a n) can be written as X n /a n = o p (1), i.e.
Note that almost uniform convergence of a sequence does not mean that the sequence converges uniformly almost everywhere as might be inferred from the name. However, Egorov's theorem does guarantee that on a finite measure space, a sequence of functions that converges almost everywhere also converges almost uniformly on the same set.