Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Bibliographies on a topic outline the main scholarly sources in a subject area and provide a good starting point, where they are available. Once you have found one good scholarly source, you can see what sources it cites and what cited it (citation chaining). This video describes citation chaining using Google Scholar.
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
Find this article at PubMed Central, a medical database; Find this article in Paperity, a multidisciplinary aggregator of open access journals and papers; Find this article in arXiv, a database of papers in computer science, physics, and mathematics; Find this article in the Digital Commons Network, a multidisciplinary collection of scholarly ...
Reference guide to articles in >470 periodical magazines and journals, organized by article subject (1890 to present) Subscription H. W. Wilson Company: Rock's Backpages [66] Music: 40,000 Primary documents from the history of rock and roll. Articles, including interviews, features and reviews, which covered popular music from blues and soul
Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. . Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other ...
Such articles may be based uncritically on a press release, which themselves promote research with uncertain relevance to human health and do not acknowledge important limitations, even when issued by an academic medical center. [30] For Wikipedia's purposes, articles in the popular press are generally considered independent, primary sources. A ...
The author is an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications, except for exceptional claims. [4] Take care when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else will probably have done so.
"[It is not] always easy to distinguish primary from secondary sources. A newspaper article is a primary source if it reports events, but a secondary source if it analyses and comments on those events". [3] "In the humanities, age is an important factor in determining whether an article is a primary or secondary source.