Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The nirvana fallacy is the informal fallacy of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. [1] It can also refer to the tendency to assume there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the "perfect solution fallacy".
Moralistic fallacy is the inverse of naturalistic fallacy. Moving the goalposts (raising the bar) – argument in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded. Nirvana fallacy (perfect-solution fallacy) – solutions to problems are rejected because they are not perfect.
Fallacies of definition; ... Nirvana fallacy; Nominal fallacy; O. One-sided argument; P. Package-deal fallacy; Parable of the broken window; Parade of horribles;
The nirvana fallacy is is a fallacy not because some solutions are idealistic by some objective standard, but because the solutions posited by the person committing the fallacy are irrelevant (as in the example of COVID-19 vaccines, which were never intended to eradicate the virus), or because imperfect solutions are dismissed without serious ...
Escalation of commitment, irrational escalation, or sunk cost fallacy, where people justify increased investment in a decision, based on the cumulative prior investment, despite new evidence suggesting that the decision was probably wrong. G. I. Joe fallacy, the tendency to think that knowing about cognitive bias is enough to overcome it. [66]
The term nirvana in the soteriological sense of "blown out, extinguished" state of liberation appears at many places in the Vedas and even more in the post-Buddhist Bhagavata Purana, however populist opinion does not give credit to either the Vedas or the Upanishads. Collins states, "the Buddhists seem to have been the first to call it nirvana."
The description of the fallacy in this form is attributed to British philosopher Antony Flew, who wrote, in his 1966 book God & Philosophy, . In this ungracious move a brash generalization, such as No Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, when faced with falsifying facts, is transformed while you wait into an impotent tautology: if ostensible Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, then this is ...
Nirvana fallacy Information at IDEAS / RePEc Harold Demsetz ( / ˈ d ɛ m s ɛ t s / ; May 31, 1930 – January 4, 2019) [ 1 ] was an American professor of economics at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).