Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
‘factor(x, exclude = NULL)’ applied to a factor without ‘NA’s is a no-operation unless there are unused levels: in that case, a factor with the reduced level set is returned. ‘as.factor’ coerces its argument to a factor. It is an abbreviated (sometimes faster) form of ‘factor’. Performance: as.factor > factor when input is a factor
But annoyingly, there is nothing to handle the factor -> numeric conversion. As an extension of Joshua Ulrich's answer, I would suggest to overcome this omission with the definition of your own idiomatic function: as.double.factor <- function(x) {as.numeric(levels(x))[x]}
When creating the factor from b you can specify the ordering of the levels using factor(b, levels = c(3,1,2,4,5)). Do this in a data processing step outside the lm() call though. My answer below uses the relevel() function so you can create a factor and then shift the reference level around to suit as you need to. –
From my understanding, the currently accepted answer only changes the order of the factor levels, not the actual labels (i.e., how the levels of the factor are called). To illustrate the difference between levels and labels , consider the following example:
I would like to change the format (class) of some columns of my data.frame object (mydf) from charactor to factor. I don't want to do this when I'm reading the text file by read.table() function. ...
Factor and Categorical are the same, as far as I know. I think it was initially called Factor, and then changed to Categorical. To convert to Categorical maybe you can use pandas.Categorical.from_array, something like this:
ggplot(mtcars) + geom_point(aes(x=mpg, y=drat, colour=gear)) This communicates a continuum of points, and it's thus not ideal for a set of separate possibilities. (Indeed, once you get to five or six possibilities the colors can be hard to distinguish from each other). When gears is treated like a factor, the colors are chosen to be ...
3. If you wanted to forego the dplyr, you can split into lists. df <- split(df, list(df[[obs1]], df[[obs2]]) If you wanted the count, you just create an sapply or lapply call to run through the lists and get the count of each one. Or literally any other function you want. answered Dec 12, 2015 at 1:08. black_sheep07.
All arrange does is re-order rows, this has no effect on the levels of the factor and hence no effect on the order of a legend or axis in ggplot. All factors have an order for their levels. The difference between an ordered = TRUE factor and a regular factor is how the contrasts are set up in a model.
Very short : levels are the input, labels are the output in the factor() function. A factor has only a level attribute, which is set by the labels argument in the factor() function. This is different from the concept of labels in statistical packages like SPSS, and can be confusing in the beginning. What you do in this line of code.