Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Unless the source exercises editorial control, e-prints and conference abstracts should be considered to be self-published. The above questions can be used to consider the reliability of self-published scientific material. See the policy on self-published sources at WP:SPS. Many of them are also primary sources, which should be treated with ...
Material about living persons available solely in questionable sources or sources of dubious value should not be used, either as a source or as an external link . Never use self-published books, zines , websites, webforums, blogs and tweets as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the ...
The source is considered generally unreliable, and use of the source is generally prohibited. Despite this, the source may be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions, although reliable secondary sources are still preferred. An edit filter, may be in place to warn editors who attempt to cite the source as a reference in articles. The warning ...
- Ben Yagoda [4] Here's from a 2012 piece in the Columbia Journalism Review: "To start checking a nonfiction piece, you begin by consulting the writer about how the piece was put together and using the writer’s sources as well as our own departmental sources. We then essentially take the piece apart and put it back together again.
Avoid undue weight when using single studies in such fields. Studies relating to complex and abstruse fields, such as medicine, are less definitive and should be avoided. Secondary sources, such as meta-analyses, textbooks, and scholarly review articles are preferred when available, so as to provide proper context.
Self published sources such as personal web pages, personally published print runs and blogs have not been subject to any form of independent fact-checking and so have lower levels of reliability than published news sources (The Economist) and others with editorial oversight, which in turn are less reliable than professional or peer-reviewed ...
These types of self-references limit the use of Wikipedia as a free content encyclopedia suitable for forking, as permitted by our licenses. The goal of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedia, not merely to perpetuate itself, so the articles produced should be useful, even outside the context of the project used to create them. This means that ...
As a reference: * Sometimes. Generally, the only notable facts that a petition site is a reliable (albeit primary, self-published, and usually non-independent) source for are its existence, the petition wording, the start and end dates, and for the final outcome after the petition is closed. A notable petition will usually be reported on by an ...