When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_(Inspector_of_Taxes...

    Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3, is a landmark decision of the House of Lords on the use of legislative history in statutory interpretation.The court established the principle that when primary legislation is ambiguous then, in certain circumstances, the court may refer to statements made in the House of Commons or House of Lords in an attempt to interpret the meaning of the ...

  3. Peter Hart (historian) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hart_(historian)

    Hart wrote of ten of the killings, "these men were shot because they were Protestant". [21] Others point to evidence suggesting that, while the IRA action was unauthorised, the men were targeted due to allegations they were informers, not because of their religion. Again, criticism centered on Hart's use of evidence.

  4. Portal:Law/Selected cases/11 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Law/Selected_cases/11

    Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1992] UKHL 3, is a landmark decision of the House of Lords on the use of legislative history in statutory interpretation.The court established the principle that when primary legislation is ambiguous then, in certain circumstances, the court may refer to statements made in the House of Commons or House of Lords in an attempt to interpret the meaning of the ...

  5. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    First adopted in 1975, the Federal Rules of Evidence codify the evidence law that applies in United States federal courts. [1] In addition, many states in the United States have either adopted the Federal Rules of Evidence, with or without local variations, or have revised their own evidence rules or codes to at least partially follow the federal rules.

  6. Voir dire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voir_dire

    In this procedure, evidence given in the voir dire, if then found admissible, is transferred into the main trial without having to be repeated. [ 9 ] In Australia, the rule about voir dire is in section 189 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth): "On a voir dire parties can call witnesses, cross-examine opponent's witnesses and make submissions- as ...

  7. Why did Martha Stewart go to prison? She opens up in ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-did-martha-stewart-prison...

    Why did Martha Stewart go to jail? What she said about her insider trading scandal and the five months she spent in prison.

  8. Relevance (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_(law)

    Coincidence evidence is evidence using the unlikelihood of two or more events occurring coincidentally in order to prove that a person did a particular act. Judges have to determine whether these types of evidence, based on how the parties are looking to use the evidence; this determines which admissibility test applies, and what directions to ...

  9. Kevin Hart accused of fabricating evidence in $12-million ...

    www.aol.com/news/kevin-hart-accused-fabricating...

    A former friend of Kevin Hart has accused Hart in a lawsuit of submitting fabricated evidence to the Los Angeles County district attorney's office stemming from his 2017 sex tape scandal, and ...