Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
We also have the rule that 10 x + y is divisible iff x + 4 y is divisible by 13. For example, to test the divisibility of 1761 by 13 we can reduce this to the divisibility of 461 by the first rule. Using the second rule, this reduces to the divisibility of 50, and doing that again yields 5. So, 1761 is not divisible by 13.
Two properties of 1001 are the basis of a divisibility test for 7, 11 and 13. The method is along the same lines as the divisibility rule for 11 using the property 10 ≡ -1 (mod 11). The two properties of 1001 are 1001 = 7 × 11 × 13 in prime factors 10 3 ≡ -1 (mod 1001) The method simultaneously tests for divisibility by any of the factors ...
Paul Erdős gave a proof [11] that also relies on the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. Every positive integer has a unique factorization into a square-free number r and a square number s 2 . For example, 75,600 = 2 4 3 3 5 2 7 1 = 21 ⋅ 60 2 .
This property is the key in the proof of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. [note 2] It is used to define prime elements, a generalization of prime numbers to arbitrary commutative rings. Euclid's lemma shows that in the integers irreducible elements are also prime elements. The proof uses induction so it does not apply to all integral domains.
The following laws can be verified using the properties of divisibility. They are a special case of rules in modular arithmetic, and are commonly used to check if an equality is likely to be correct by testing the parity of each side. As with ordinary arithmetic, multiplication and addition are commutative and associative in modulo 2 arithmetic ...
The divisors of 10 illustrated with Cuisenaire rods: 1, 2, 5, and 10. In mathematics, a divisor of an integer , also called a factor of , is an integer that may be multiplied by some integer to produce . [1] In this case, one also says that is a multiple of .
The height of a partially ordered set is defined to be the maximum cardinality of a chain, a totally ordered subset of the given partial order. For instance, in the set of positive integers from 1 to N, ordered by divisibility, one of the largest chains consists of the powers of two that lie within that range, from which it follows that the height of this partial order is + ⌊ ⌋.
The theorem is frequently referred to as the division algorithm (although it is a theorem and not an algorithm), because its proof as given below lends itself to a simple division algorithm for computing q and r (see the section Proof for more). Division is not defined in the case where b = 0; see division by zero.