Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Kuleana Act of 1850, proposed by the King in Privy Council passed by the Hawaii legislature created a system for private land ownership in seven parts. [1] Section 1 recognized ownership of government plots occupied and improved by families. Section 2 expanded title to other types of land. Section 3 defined land boundaries and the ability ...
When looking to invest in Hawaii’s real estate market, it’s important to find properties that will yield a high return on investment. To do that, you’ll need to consider the type of property ...
The six distinct kuleana rights are: [1] (1) reasonable access to the land-locked kuleana from major thoroughfares; (2) agricultural uses, such as taro cultivation; (3) traditional gathering rights in and around the ahupua'a [neighborhood]; (4) a house lot not larger than 1/4 acre; (5) sufficient water for drinking and irrigation from nearby ...
Hawaii's picturesque landscapes and serene lifestyle have attracted billionaire investors like Mark Zuckerberg and Marc Benioff, who are snapping up prime real estate across the islands ...
Internet real estate. An electronic version of the real estate industry, Internet real estate is the concept of publishing housing estates for sale or rent online, and for consumers seeking to buy or rent properties through such platforms. Often, Internet real estate properties are listed and managed by landlords themselves.
Apr. 9—Total sales volume for the Hawaii investment market in 2023 declined 18.6 % to $1.93 billion from $2.37 billion in 2022. Hospitality purchases at more than 23 % were the largest share of ...
Kaneohe Ranch Management Limited manages the real estate owned by the family of Harold K.L. Castle and Alice H. Castle, and their non-profit charitable foundation, the Harold K.L. Castle Foundation founded in 1962. In 2014, most of its real estate assets were sold for $373 million. [1] The real estate portfolio had consisted of land holdings on ...
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff , 467 U.S. 229 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state could use eminent domain to take land that was overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of private landowners and redistribute it to the wider population of private residents.