When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Coates v. City of Cincinnati - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coates_v._City_of_Cincinnati

    Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 (1971), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a local city ordinance that made it a criminal offense for three or more persons to assemble on a sidewalk and "annoy" any passersby was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.

  3. List of English words with disputed usage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_with...

    A aggravate – Some have argued that this word should not be used in the sense of "to annoy" or "to oppress", but only to mean "to make worse". According to AHDI, the use of "aggravate" as "annoy" occurs in English as far back as the 17th century. In Latin, from which the word was borrowed, both meanings were used. Sixty-eight percent of AHD4's usage panel approves of its use in "It's the ...

  4. Judge upholds Ohio's gender-affirming care ban; civil rights ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/judge-upholds-ohios-gender...

    An Ohio law that limits gender-affirming health care for youth under 18 can go into effect, a county judge ruled Tuesday. The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio said it will file an immediate ...

  5. 2011 Ohio Issue 2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Ohio_Issue_2

    The Ohio Collective Bargaining Limit Repeal appeared on the November 8, 2011 general election ballot in the state of Ohio as a veto referendum.Senate Bill 5 (SB5) was repealed by Ohio voters after a campaign by firefighters, police officers and teachers against the measure, [1] which would have limited collective bargaining for public employees in the state.

  6. Ohio AG Yost says Issue 1 overrides abortion ban, but appeal ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-ag-yost-says-issue-225225760.html

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Due Process Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause

    In Bolling v. Sharpe 347 U.S. 497 (1954), the Supreme Court held that "the concepts of equal protection and due process, both stemming from our American ideal of fairness, are not mutually exclusive." The Court thus interpreted the Fifth Amendment's due process clause to include an equal protection element. In Lawrence v.

  8. Who's funding the Ohio Issue 1 campaigns? Donors from ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/weather/whos-funding-ohio-issue-1...

    Supporters and opponents of Issue 1 say they want to combat out-of-state interests in Ohio. That's where most of their money is coming from.

  9. 2004 Ohio Issue 1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Ohio_Issue_1

    Section 15.11 is a provision in the Ohio Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. [2] Approved as a constitutional amendment in 2004 under the name of "Issue One", it received support from 61.7% of voters.