When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.

  3. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency , 566 U.S. 120 (2012), also known as Sackett I (to distinguish it from the 2023 case ), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that orders issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act . [ 1 ]

  4. Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental...

    Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency may refer to either of two United States Supreme Court cases: . Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (alternatively called Sackett I), 570 U.S. 205 (2013), a case in which the Court ruled that orders issued by the EPA under the Clean Water Act are subject to the Administrative Procedure Act.

  5. NC cut its wetlands rules. Now millions of acres may be ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/nc-cut-wetlands-rules-now-083000916.html

    Just weeks before the Republican-controlled General Assembly passed the Farm Act over Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto, the U.S. Supreme Court in Sackett v. EPA narrowed the definition of wetlands covered ...

  6. If bulkhead construction followed state and local procedures ...

    www.aol.com/bulkhead-construction-followed-state...

    The illegality of relying on such temporary flooding had already been decided by the unanimous Supreme Court decision (Sackett v. EPA 2023 that simply reaffirmed Rapanos v U.S. 2006) and is ...

  7. Proposed NC law could mean Supreme Court wetlands ruling has ...

    www.aol.com/proposed-nc-law-could-mean-150558592...

    NC legislators are considering changing the state’s wetlands definition to match the federal government’s, which the Supreme Court sharply limited.

  8. EPA slashes federally protected waters by more than half ...

    www.aol.com/news/epa-significantly-shrinks...

    The Environmental Protection Agency and US Army on Tuesday released a new rule that slashes federally protected water by more than half, following a Supreme Court decision in May that rolled back ...

  9. Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entergy_Corp._v._River...

    Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc., 556 U.S. 208 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) interpretation of the Clean Water Act regulations with regard to cooling water intakes for power plants. Existing facilities are mandated to use the "Best Technology Available" to ...