When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: no script viagra reviagrixs side effects mayo clinic reviews cme

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Viagra: What It Treats & Its Side Effects ( Plus What It Was ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/viagra-treats-side-effects...

    Like any medication, side effects of Viagra may come with its many benefits. Still, Viagra is safe when used as directed. Viagra may cause common side effects, including:

  3. Sildenafil - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sildenafil

    Sildenafil, sold under the brand name Viagra, among others, is a medication used to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension. [4][8] It is also sometimes used off-label for the treatment of certain symptoms in secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. [9]

  4. What Should I Do If Viagra Is Not Working for Me? - AOL

    www.aol.com/viagra-not-working-185700342.html

    They can recommend treatments for any physical or mental health conditions that have come up, increase your dosage of Viagra or switch you to a different ED medication. If your ED is severe, a pro ...

  5. Weighing the Pros & Cons of 4 Common ED Pills - AOL

    www.aol.com/weighing-pros-cons-4-common...

    Over the last 25 years, (ED) medications such as Viagra and others have become common and normal pieces of bedroom tool kit. These little pills have helped hundreds of millions of men all over the ...

  6. Erectile dysfunction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erectile_dysfunction

    Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Vardenafil [ 13 ] Erectile dysfunction (ED), also referred to as impotence, is a form of sexual dysfunction in males characterized by the persistent or recurring inability to achieve or maintain a penile erection with sufficient rigidity and duration for satisfactory sexual activity. It is the most common sexual problem ...

  7. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayo_Collaborative...

    Mayo v. Prometheus, 566 U.S. 66 (2012), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that unanimously held that claims directed to a method of giving a drug to a patient, measuring metabolites of that drug, and with a known threshold for efficacy in mind, deciding whether to increase or decrease the dosage of the drug, were not patent-eligible subject matter.