Ad
related to: mozilla public license vs mitopera.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird. [9] The MPL is developed and maintained by Mozilla, [10] which seeks to balance the concerns of both open-source and proprietary developers.
The following table compares various features of each license and is a general guide to the terms and conditions of each license, based on seven subjects or categories. Recent tools like the European Commissions' Joinup Licensing Assistant, [ 10 ] makes possible the licenses selection and comparison based on more than 40 subjects or categories ...
For example, the MIT license describes the right to sublicense. [54] One of the strengths of open-source development is the continual process where developers can build on the derivative works of each other and combine their projects into collective works. Explicitly making covered code sublicensable provides a legal advantage when tracking the ...
Free-software licenses that use "weak" copyleft include the GNU Lesser General Public License and the Mozilla Public License. The GNU General Public License is an example of a license implementing strong copyleft. An even stronger copyleft license is the AGPL, which requires the publishing of the source code for software as a service use cases.
Popular free and open source licenses include the Apache License, the MIT License, the GNU General Public License (GPL), the BSD Licenses, the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL).
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 11 January 2025. Software licensed to ensure source code usage rights Open-source software shares similarities with free software and is part of the broader term free and open-source software. For broader coverage of this topic, see open-source-software movement. It has been suggested that this article ...
Seven approved licenses are particularly recommended by the OSI as "popular, widely used, or having strong communities": [19] Apache License 2.0; BSD 3-Clause and BSD 2-Clause Licenses; All versions of the GNU General Public License; All versions of the GNU Lesser Public License; MIT License; Mozilla Public License 2.0
Each license is identified by a full name, such as "Mozilla Public License 2.0" and a short identifier, here "MPL-2.0". Licenses can be combined by operators AND and OR, and grouping (, ). For example, (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) means that one can choose between Apache-2.0 (Apache License) or MIT (MIT license).