Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 22–193. Argued December 6, 2023—Decided April 17, 2024. Sergeant Jatonya Clayborn Muldrow maintains that her employer, the St. Louis Police Department, transferred her from one job to another because she is a woman.
The Justices continued to shape the workplace law landscape by ruling on an array of issues involving federal agency power, labor relations, arbitration, and employment discrimination.
Oct 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to decide whether it should be more difficult for workers from "majority backgrounds," such as white or heterosexual people, to prove...
Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri. Holding: An employee challenging a job transfer under Title VII must show that the transfer brought about some harm with respect to an identifiable term or condition of employment, but that harm need not be significant.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday made it easier for workers to bring employment discrimination suits over job transfers based on sex, race, religion or national origin.
A case in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in transfer decisions that cause some harm, not merely "significant" harm. Granted Jun 30, 2023
The Supreme Court has produced some headline making decisions recently, particularly in the labor and employment law area. The 2023–2024 term appears to be another blockbuster year. Below are brief summaries of just four of the major employment law related cases that will be heard this term.
On December 6, 2023, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, a case involving a St. Louis Police Department officer’s claim that she was subject to a discriminatory job transfer based on her gender.
On April 17, 2024, the United States Supreme Court delivered a pivotal ruling in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, fundamentally reshaping the landscape of Title VII litigation. This landmark decision dismantled the longstanding requirement, upheld by several Circuit Courts, requiring plaintiffs to demonstrate “significant harm” to seek ...
The Supreme Court agreed to decide what protections Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides to employees who contend they were the victim of a discriminatory transfer. The justices announced on Friday that they had granted review in Muldrow v. St. Louis and six other cases, two of which w