Ad
related to: sixth circuit court of appeals opinions md local
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 21-3886 (2023), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, on a challenge by Consumers' Research, a free-market advocacy organization, against the Federal Communications Commission's Universal Service Fund program.
Tennessee v. Federal Communications Commission, 832 F.3d 597 (2016), was a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, [1] holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have the authority to preempt states from enforcing "anti-expansion" statutes that prohibit local municipal broadband networks from being expanded into nearby communities.
The Thursday ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals overturns last year’s FCC vote, which reinstated the net neutrality rules barring broadband providers from blocking or throttling internet ...
546 U.S. 1 Decided October 11, 2005. Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded. The Court of Appeals had ruled that the habeas corpus petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies by not arguing his federal claim of prosecutorial misconduct in state court, which it concluded only because the state court's opinion failed to discuss that argument.
A three-judge panel of the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the FCC lacked authority to reinstate the rules initially implemented in 2015 by the agency under Democratic former ...
Case history; Prior: 492 F.3d 743 (6th Cir. 2007); cert. granted, 554 U.S. 916 (2008). See Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 (2002) for additional prior history.: Holding; Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated and remanded to United States District Court to determine whether the prosecution's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated Cone's right to due ...
A three-judge panel of the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the FCC lacked authority to reinstate the rules initially implemented in 2015 by the agency under Democratic ...
In Taylor v.City of Saginaw, et al., No. 17-2126 (6th Cir. 2019), [1] the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the practice of “chalking” in which parking enforcement officers apply chalk to mark the tires of parked vehicles in order to track the duration of time for which those vehicles have been parked, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment to the ...