When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: is indeed credible source

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Indeed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeed

    Indeed, Inc. is an American worldwide employment website for job listings launched in November 2004. It is an independent subsidiary of multinational company Recruit Holdings . It is headquartered in Austin, Texas , and Stamford, Connecticut , with additional offices around the world. [ 3 ]

  3. Help : Introduction to referencing/reliable sources quiz

    en.wikipedia.org/.../reliable_sources_quiz

    Not reliable. Forbes, a well-known American business magazine, might seem at first glance like a reliable source. And indeed, content written by Forbes staffers is considered generally reliable. However, this article was not written by a Forbes staffer, but rather by an unaffiliated contributor.

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Does the source indeed support the material? The author. Who is the author? Does the author have a Wikipedia article? What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience? What else has the author published? Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works? How does the author make a living?

  5. Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/reliable ...

    en.wikipedia.org/.../reliable_sources_quiz

    Not reliable. Forbes, a well-known American business magazine, might seem at first glance like a reliable source. And indeed, content written by Forbes staffers is considered generally reliable. However, this article was not written by a Forbes staffer, but rather by an unaffiliated contributor.

  6. Wikipedia : Acceptable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Acceptable_sources

    Exceptions exist for anonymous sources when interviewed or studied by a reliable source who vouches for the anonymous source, such as Deep Throat prior to his identity being disclosed; as well as for surveys and such where the individual participants are unknown, but the statistical aggregate is published. Pseudonymous source may be acceptable ...

  7. Wikipedia:No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_reliable...

    "Keep and improve" is a typical battlecry for users who believe that the topic of an article is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Indeed, this may be the case, but an article completely lacking of reliable sources is likely a crock-pot of original research, none of which would remain if the article ever ascended to Featured Article status.

  8. List of fact-checking websites - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites

    Cofacts: an open source project associated with the G0v movement [92] [93] [94] MyGoPen : a project run by Taiwanese civil society group. [ 95 ] [ 92 ] It is a signatory to the International Fact-checking Network's codes of principles. [ 96 ]

  9. Whether a source is usable also depends on context. Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source ...