Ad
related to: state farm accident settlements form- State Minimum Coverage
Find the lowest rates in your state
Save up to $500/Y on car insurance
- Cheapest In Your Area
Find the cheapest rates!
All in 1 Place.
- 2024 New Rates
Find cheap rates - from $19/mo
Compare Car Insurance 2023
- Get Gap Insurance
Looking for a cheap GAP insurance
Compare and save in 60 seconds
- Full Coverage
View multiple rates side-by-side
Trusted rate comparison website
- SR22 Coverage
Get customized coverage rates
Compare and save in 60 seconds
- State Minimum Coverage
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the due process clause usually limits punitive damage awards to less than ten times the size of the compensatory damages awarded and that punitive damage awards of four times the compensatory damage award is "close to the line of constitutional impropriety".
For example, the 2003 Campbell decision involved State Farm's handling of litigation resulting from a fatal car accident in 1981, 22 years earlier. Another important feature of Campbell is that it powerfully illustrates how an insurer cannot avoid tort liability for bad faith by belatedly attempting to cure its breach of contract.
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983), commonly known in U.S. administrative law as State Farm, is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars.
The settlement includes those who received erroneous overdraft fees in their checking accounts, misapplied payments in their auto loans and even negligent foreclosure proceedings.
An uninsured motorist clause is a provision commonly found in United States automobile insurance policies that provides for a driver to receive damages for any injury he or she receives from an uninsured, negligent driver. The owner of the policy pays a premium to the insurance company to include this clause.
In Australia, punitive damages are not available for breach of contract, [5] but are possible for tort cases.. The law is less settled regarding equitable wrongs. In Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd, [6] the defendant employees knowingly breached contractual and fiduciary duties to their employer by diverting business to themselves and misusing its confidential information.
Jan. 17—The state of New Mexico may not be able to pay its legal settlements, including those pertaining to wrongful death cases involving children, without an infusion of nearly $25 million ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!