Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
With half a million copies sold by the end of the American Revolution, “Common Sense” remains one of the best-selling works of all time relative to the U.S. population (2.5 million in 1776 ...
The common sense is where this comparison happens, and this must occur by comparing impressions (or symbols or markers; σημεῖον, sēmeîon, 'sign, mark') of what the specialist senses have perceived. [16] The common sense is therefore also where a type of consciousness originates, "for it makes us aware of having sensations at all". And ...
The concept of common sense is a long-standing term, based on human experience and people's individual perceptions. Common sense isn't actually common, in either sense: it is different from person to person, and may not be employed even when many editors could agree on what it is in a particular situation.
Paine's attack on monarchy in Common Sense is essentially an attack on George III. Whereas colonial resentments were originally directed primarily against the king's ministers and Parliament, Paine laid the responsibility firmly at the king's door. Common Sense was the most widely read pamphlet of the American Revolution. It was a clarion call ...
Common Sense was founded in 1932 by two Yale University graduates, Selden Rodman, and Alfred M. Bingham, son of United States Senator Hiram Bingham III. [3] Its contributors were mostly progressives from a wide range of the left-right spectrum, from agrarian populists, "insurgent" Republicans and Farmer-Labor Party activists to independent progressives, Democrat mavericks and democratic ...
Plain Truth goes on denounce Common Sense ' s attempt to utilise religion to attack the institution of monarchy, pithily summarising that Thomas Paine should have added "Common Sense, and blood will attend it." [2] Chalmers then goes on to describe the British Constitution as being one consisting of "Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Democracy."
This is why primary sources, people who are very close to the subject (eyewitnesses or polls, for example), must be simply descriptive, not analytical (their intimacy with the subject could be considered a conflict of interest, or their limited scope may not be sufficient for an objective analysis).
Don't follow written instructions mindlessly, but rather, consider how the encyclopedia is improved or damaged by each edit (see also Use common sense, below). Rules derive their power to compel not from being written down on a page labeled "guideline" or "policy", but from being a reflection of the shared opinions and practices of many editors ...