Ads
related to: is the echr binding on a car battery better than 12 weeks
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Article also prohibits a heavier penalty being imposed than was applicable at the time when the criminal act was committed. Article 7 incorporates the legal principle nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege (no crime, no penalty without law) into the convention. Relevant cases are: Kokkinakis v. Greece [1993] ECHR 20; S.A.S. v. France [2014 ...
[11] [12] In 2007, the Court ruled that Russia was responsible for the killings of a human rights activist, Zura Bitiyeva, and her family. [13] Bitiyeva herself had filed a complaint against Moscow with the Court in 2000 for abuse while in detention, in the then-second case from Chechnya, but she was murdered in 2003 before the ruling was ...
The ECJ rules on EU law while the ECtHR rules on the ECHR, which covers the 46 member states of the Council of Europe. Cases cannot be brought in the ECtHR against EU institutions (as the EU is not a member in its own right), but the ECtHR has ruled that states that are members of both organisations cannot escape their human rights obligations ...
At the time, more than 90 per cent of applications were declared to be inadmissible, and the majority of cases decided—around 60 per cent of the decisions by the court—related to what is termed repetitive cases: where the court has already delivered judgment finding a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights or where well ...
Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights lists the prohibited grounds against which discrimination in illegal. The text states that "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in [the] Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a ...
The margin of appreciation (or margin of state discretion) is a legal doctrine with a wide scope in international human rights law.It was developed by the European Court of Human Rights to judge whether a state party to the European Convention on Human Rights should be sanctioned for limiting the enjoyment of rights.