When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. In re Ferguson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Ferguson

    In re Ferguson, 558 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009) [1] is an early 2009 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affirming a rejection of business method claims by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  3. 2020 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_term_opinions_of_the...

    1 1 7 15 Associate Justice: Samuel Alito: George W. Bush: January 31, 2006 82.1% 55/67 6 8 1 4 19 Associate Justice: Sonia Sotomayor: Barack Obama: August 6, 2009 67.6% 46/68 6 6 3 5 20 Associate Justice: Elena Kagan: Barack Obama: August 7, 2010 73.5% 50/68 6 1 0 4 11 Associate Justice: Neil Gorsuch: Donald Trump: April 7, 2017 86.8% 59/68 6 8 ...

  4. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland...

    Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 vote that a 2017 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) order to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program was "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and ...

  5. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  6. In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Terrorist_Attacks_on...

    Al Baraka Banking and Investment on behalf of a group of 600 9/11 survivors and family members who called themselves the 9/11 Families United to Bankrupt Terrorism. [1] The plaintiffs' group eventually grew to include more than 6,500 members. The case has had so many delays that it has been compared to Jarndyce v.

  7. Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._Mazars_USA,_LLP

    Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, 591 U.S. ___ (2020) was a landmark US Supreme Court case involving subpoenas issued by committees of the US House of Representatives to obtain the tax returns of President Donald Trump, who had litigated against his personal accounting firm to prevent this disclosure, although the committees had been cleared by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of ...

  8. Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits...

    Judge Jeremy Kernodle, U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, called for Vice President Pence to issue a response to the lawsuit by December 31, 2020, at 5 p.m. and for Gohmert to issue a reply to Pence by January 1, 2021, at 9 a.m. [73] Pence replied on December 31 that the suit should be dismissed because he is not the ...

  9. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.