When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fisher v. University of Texas (2013) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_v._University_of...

    Plaintiffs Abigail Noel Fisher and Rachel Multer Michalewicz applied to the University of Texas at Austin in 2008 and were denied admission. The two women, both white, filed suit, alleging that the university had discriminated against them on the basis of their race in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [4]

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) Racial quotas in educational institutions violate the Equal Protection Clause, but a more narrowly tailored use of race in admission decisions may be permissible. (Partially overruled by Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023)) Batson v.

  4. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    With its companion case, Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, the Supreme Court effectively overruled Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) [6] and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), which validated some affirmative action in college admissions provided that race had a limited role in decisions. [c]

  5. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_the_University...

    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a dispute over whether preferential treatment for minorities could reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution.

  6. Supreme Court strikes down race-based affirmative action in ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-strikes-down...

    In another major reversal, the Supreme Court forbids the use of race as an admissions factor at colleges and universities. Supreme Court strikes down race-based affirmative action in college ...

  7. Gratz v. Bollinger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratz_v._Bollinger

    Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. In a 6–3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, Chief Justice Rehnquist, writing for the Court, ruled the University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points towards admission to ...

  8. Should Legacy Status Matter Anymore in College Admissions?

    www.aol.com/legacy-status-matter-anymore-college...

    Elite colleges say they’re ending alumni preference to make admissions fairer. Critics call it a PR move to gloss over troubling inequities. Meanwhile, families are trying to figure out what ...

  9. Criticism of college and university rankings in North America

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_college_and...

    Reed College. In 1995, Reed College refused to participate in U.S. News & World Report annual survey. According to Reed's Office of Admissions, "Reed College has actively questioned the methodology and usefulness of college rankings ever since the magazine's best-colleges list first appeared in 1983, despite the fact that the issue ranked Reed among the top ten national liberal arts colleges.