Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The ternary operator can also be viewed as a binary map operation. In R—and other languages with literal expression tuples—one can simulate the ternary operator with something like the R expression c (expr1, expr2)[1 + condition] (this idiom is slightly more natural in languages with 0-origin subscripts).
In computer science, a ternary operator is an operator that takes three arguments (or operands). [1] The arguments and result can be of different types. Many programming languages that use C-like syntax [4] feature a ternary operator, ?:, which defines a conditional expression.
In most programming languages, ?: is called the conditional operator. It is a type of ternary operator. However, ternary operator in most situations refers specifically to ?: because it is the only operator that takes three operands. [2]
Many languages have an operator to accomplish the same purpose, generally referred to as a conditional operator (or, less precisely, as a ternary operator); the best known is ?:, as used in C, C++, and related languages. Some of the problems with the IIf function, as discussed later, do not exist with a conditional operator, because the ...
Boolean logic allows 2 2 = 4 unary operators; the addition of a third value in ternary logic leads to a total of 3 3 = 27 distinct operators on a single input value. (This may be made clear by considering all possible truth tables for an arbitrary unary operator.
The ternary operator (,,) = is one such operator which is actually a unary operator applied to one input, and ignoring the other two inputs. "Not" is a unary operator, it takes a single term (¬P). The rest are binary operators, taking two terms to make a compound statement (P ∧ Q, P ∨ Q, P → Q, P ↔ Q).
For n = 1 the median operator is just the unary identity operation x. For n = 3 the ternary median operator can be expressed using conjunction and disjunction as xy + yz + zx. For an arbitrary n there exists a monotone formula for majority of size O(n 5.3). This is proved using probabilistic method. Thus, this formula is non-constructive. [3]
In computer programming, there is often a syntactical distinction between operators and functions; syntactical operators usually have arity 1, 2, or 3 (the ternary operator?: is also common). Functions vary widely in the number of arguments, though large numbers can become unwieldy.