When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: r and m wholesale canton ohio

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Category:Companies based in Canton, Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Companies_based...

    This page was last edited on 16 September 2024, at 22:01 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  3. Category:Defunct companies based in Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Defunct_companies...

    Defunct newspapers published in Ohio (2 C, 23 P) Pages in category "Defunct companies based in Ohio" The following 63 pages are in this category, out of 63 total.

  4. Hercules Engine Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules_Engine_Company

    Hercules Engine Corporation was an American engine manufacturer located in Canton, Ohio. History ... (929 N⋅m) Diamond T 980/981 [6] HXC: 855 cu in (14.0 L)

  5. Hooven-Owens-Rentschler - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooven-Owens-Rentschler

    The firm was the successor to the firm of Owens, Ebert & Dyer (founded in 1845 by Job E. Owens) which went into receivership in 1876. [1]In 1882, George A. Rentschler, J. C. Hooven, Henry C. Sohn, George H. Helvey, and James E. Campbell merged the firm with the iron works of Sohn and Rentschler, [1] [2] and adopted the name Hooven, Owens, Rentschler Co.

  6. Belden Brick Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belden_Brick_Company

    The company's sixth plant was built in Sugarcreek, OH in 1957. [7] In 1968, Plant 8 was built in Sugarcreek, OH and was the largest brick plant ever built under one roof. [7] In 1970, the first plant in Canton was closed down, and Belden brickmaking in Canton ceased while the corporate headquarters remained. [7]

  7. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice_v._Akron,_Canton...

    Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R. Co., 342 U.S. 359 (1952), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that federal court rules apply when an action is brought pursuant to a federal right and where the substance of a state's rules would necessarily have an adverse effect on the protection of an individual's rights under federal law.