When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Glossary of mathematical symbols - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_mathematical...

    2. Denotes the additive inverse and is read as minus, the negative of, or the opposite of; for example, –2. 3. Also used in place of \ for denoting the set-theoretic complement; see \ in § Set theory. × (multiplication sign) 1. In elementary arithmetic, denotes multiplication, and is read as times; for example, 3 × 2. 2.

  3. Significand - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significand

    The significand [1] (also coefficient, [1] sometimes argument, [2] or more ambiguously mantissa, [3] fraction, [4] [5] [nb 1] or characteristic [6] [3]) is the first (left) part of a number in scientific notation or related concepts in floating-point representation, consisting of its significant digits.

  4. File:Decimal-fraction equivalents--v0006.svg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Decimal-fraction...

    A handy chart of decimal-fraction equivalents, 0 to 1 by 64ths. Prints nicely as 11x17 in landscape orientation. Useful for machinists who work with inch-based measurements. Date: 24 October 2007: Source: Own work: Author: Three-quarter-ten

  5. 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯ - ⋯ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_%E...

    where f (2k−1) is the (2k − 1)th derivative of f and B 2k is the (2k)th Bernoulli number: B 2 = ⁠ 1 / 6 ⁠, B 4 = ⁠− + 1 / 30 ⁠, and so on. Setting f ( x ) = x , the first derivative of f is 1, and every other term vanishes, so [ 15 ]

  6. Fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction

    Unit fractions can also be expressed using negative exponents, as in 2 −1, which represents 1/2, and 22, which represents 1/(2 2) or 1/4. A dyadic fraction is a common fraction in which the denominator is a power of two , e.g. ⁠ 1 / 8 ⁠ = ⁠ 1 / 2 3 ⁠ .

  7. Equals sign - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equals_sign

    1 + 2 = 3 + 3 = 6 + 4 = 10 + 5 = 15. Structurally, this is shorthand for ([(1 + 2 = 3) + 3 = 6] + 4 = 10) + 5 = 15, but the notation is incorrect, because each part of the equality has a different value. If interpreted strictly as it says, it would imply that 3 = 6 = 10 = 15 = 15. A correct version of the argument would be 1 + 2 = 3, 3 + 3 = 6 ...

  8. Sigmoid function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmoid_function

    ISBN 978-0-07-042807-2.. (NB. In particular see "Chapter 4: Artificial Neural Networks" (in particular pp. 96–97) where Mitchell uses the word "logistic function" and the "sigmoid function" synonymously – this function he also calls the "squashing function" – and the sigmoid (aka logistic) function is used to compress the outputs of the ...

  9. Order of operations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

    [2] [3] Thus, in the expression 1 + 2 × 3, the multiplication is performed before addition, and the expression has the value 1 + (2 × 3) = 7, and not (1 + 2) × 3 = 9. When exponents were introduced in the 16th and 17th centuries, they were given precedence over both addition and multiplication and placed as a superscript to the right of ...