Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
So, 6 is a perfect number because the proper divisors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. [2] [4] There is a one-to-one correspondence between the Mersenne primes and the even perfect numbers, but it is unknown whether there exist odd perfect numbers. This is due to the Euclid–Euler theorem, partially proved by Euclid and completed by ...
In number theory, a perfect number is a positive integer that is equal to the sum of its positive proper divisors, that is, divisors excluding the number itself. For instance, 6 has proper divisors 1, 2 and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, so 6 is a perfect number. The next perfect number is 28, since 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28.
The left side of this identity describes a square number, while the right side describes a triangular number, so the result is a square triangular number. Falcón and Díaz-Barrero (2006) proved another identity relating Pell numbers to squares and showing that the sum of the Pell numbers up to P 4n +1 is always a square:
The square roots of the perfect squares (e.g., 0, 1, 4, 9, 16) are integers. In all other cases, the square roots of positive integers are irrational numbers, and hence have non-repeating decimals in their decimal representations. Decimal approximations of the square roots of the first few natural numbers are given in the following table.
Proof: 2 p+1 ≡ 2 (mod q), so 2 1 / 2 (p+1) is a square root of 2 mod q. By quadratic reciprocity, every prime modulus in which the number 2 has a square root is congruent to ±1 (mod 8). A Mersenne prime cannot be a Wieferich prime. Proof: We show if p = 2 m − 1 is a Mersenne prime, then the congruence 2 p−1 ≡ 1 (mod p 2) does ...
Notably, absent consensus, please do not add articles about individual perfect numbers themselves (such as 6). Pages in category "Perfect numbers" The following 11 pages are in this category, out of 11 total.
When a triple of numbers a, b and c forms a primitive Pythagorean triple, then (c minus the even leg) and one-half of (c minus the odd leg) are both perfect squares; however this is not a sufficient condition, as the numbers {1, 8, 9} pass the perfect squares test but are not a Pythagorean triple since 1 2 + 8 2 ≠ 9 2. At most one of a, b, c ...
A method analogous to piece-wise linear approximation but using only arithmetic instead of algebraic equations, uses the multiplication tables in reverse: the square root of a number between 1 and 100 is between 1 and 10, so if we know 25 is a perfect square (5 × 5), and 36 is a perfect square (6 × 6), then the square root of a number greater than or equal to 25 but less than 36, begins with ...