When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: dishonesty as ground for dismissal in illinois court case search 147794

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Napue v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napue_v._Illinois

    Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the knowing use of false testimony by a prosecutor in a criminal case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if the testimony affects only the credibility of the witness and does not directly relate to the innocence or guilt of ...

  3. Beauharnais v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beauharnais_v._Illinois

    Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952), was a case that came before the United States Supreme Court in 1952. It upheld an Illinois law making it illegal to publish or exhibit any writing or picture portraying the "depravity, criminality, unchastity, or lack of virtue of a class of citizens of any race, color, creed or religion".

  4. Griffin v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_v._Illinois

    The defendants then filed a petition under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 38 §§ 826–832), under which only questions arising under the State or Federal Constitution could be raised, to obtain a certified copy of the entire record for their appeal, alleging that there were manifest nonconstitutional errors in the trial that entitled them to have their ...

  5. Rivera v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivera_v._Illinois

    Case history; Prior: Holding for the defendant, People v.Rivera, 227 Ill. 2d 1, 879 N.E.2d 876 (2007).: Holding; Unintentional errors by the court, that would not have altered the proceedings of the case, do not warrant a new trial and do not violate the Sixth Amendment's clause of the right to a fair trial.

  6. Illinois v. Wardlow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Wardlow

    Illinois v. Wardlow , 528 U.S. 119 (2000), is a case decided before the United States Supreme Court involving U.S. criminal procedure regarding searches and seizures . Background

  7. Illinois quick hits: Crimo video confession admissible; pay ...

    www.aol.com/news/illinois-quick-hits-crimo-video...

    Crimo video confession admissible A judge has ruled that a video confession given by the man accused of shooting and killing seven people at an Independence Day parade in Highland Park two years ...

  8. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Brick_Co._v._Illinois

    Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court case that involved issues concerning statutory standing in antitrust law.. The decision established the rule that indirect purchasers of goods or services along a supply chain cannot seek damages for antitrust violations committed by the original manufacturer or service provider, but it permitted such claims ...

  9. Illinois quick hits: Court rules cannabis smell grounds for ...

    www.aol.com/news/illinois-quick-hits-court-rules...

    The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that the smell of raw cannabis is grounds for police to search a vehicle. Vincent Molina was a passenger in a vehicle when an Illinois state trooper smelled ...