Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency is a pending United States Supreme Court case about whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without ...
EPA: 23-1067 23-1068: Whether a final action by EPA taken pursuant to its Clean Air Act authority with respect to a single state or region may be challenged only in the D.C. Circuit because EPA published the action in the same Federal Register notice as actions affecting other states or regions and claimed to use a consistent analysis for all ...
Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file; Search. ... San Francisco [7] [8] 07/14/1989: 11/21/1989 ... EPA list of current Superfund sites in California; EPA ...
In siding with the EPA in the San Francisco case last year, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals relied in part on that precedent. The Clean Water Act, enacted in 1972, allows the EPA to set clear ...
Lawyers for San Francisco told the court it was 'unfair and unworkable' to hold the city potentially liable for huge fines because of polluted water along Pacific beaches near the city.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA / ˈ s iː. k w ə /) is a California statute passed in 1970 and signed in to law by then-governor Ronald Reagan, [1] [2] shortly after the United States federal government passed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to institute a statewide policy of environmental protection.
In a letter to the State Water Board this week, Anhthu Hoang of the EPA’s Office of External Civil Rights Compliance said the federal agency will investigate the allegations, including claims ...
Genesis B. v. EPA is a court case filed in the state of California against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The suit alleges that the EPA "intentionally allows" planet-warming gases to come from sources that it regulates. [1] The lawsuit was filed by Our Children's Trust, the law firm that brought Held v. Montana. [2]