When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Judicial interpretation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_interpretation

    Judicial interpretation is the way in which the judiciary construes the law, particularly constitutional documents, legislation and frequently used vocabulary.This is an important issue in some common law jurisdictions such as the United States, Australia and Canada, because the supreme courts of those nations can overturn laws made by their legislatures via a process called judicial review.

  3. Statutory interpretation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_interpretation

    Germans prefer a "grammatical" (literal) interpretation, because the statutory text has a democratic legitimation, and "sensible" interpretations are risky, in particular in view of German history. "Sensible" means different things to different people. The modern, common-law perception that courts actually make law is very

  4. Judiciary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary

    The Supreme Court Building houses the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.. The judiciary (also known as the judicial system, judicature, judicial branch, judiciative branch, and court or judiciary system) is the system of courts that adjudicates legal disputes/disagreements and interprets, defends, and applies the law in legal cases.

  5. Textualism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textualism

    Textualism is a formalist theory in which the interpretation of the law is based exclusively on the ordinary meaning of the legal text, where no consideration is given to non-textual sources, such as intention of the law when passed, the problem it was intended to remedy, or significant questions regarding the justice or rectitude of the law.

  6. Strict constructionism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_constructionism

    In the United States, strict constructionism is a particular legal philosophy of judicial interpretation that limits or restricts the powers of the federal government only to those expressly, i.e., explicitly and clearly, granted to the government by the United States Constitution.

  7. Living Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Constitution

    One accusation made against the living Constitution method states that judges that adhere to it are judicial activists and seek to legislate from the bench. [ citation needed ] That generally means that a judge winds up substituting his judgment on the validity, meaning, or scope of a law for that of the democratically-elected legislature.

  8. Separation of powers under the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under...

    The judicial branch of government holds powers as well. They have the ability to use express and concurrent powers to make laws and establish regulations. They use express powers to interpret laws and perform judicial review. Implied powers are used by this branch to declare laws that were previously passed by a lower court unconstitutional.

  9. Plain meaning rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_meaning_rule

    A text that means one thing in a legal context, might mean something else if it were in a technical manual or a novel. So the plain meaning of a legal text is something like the meaning that would be understood by competent speakers of the natural language in which the text was written who are within the intended readership of the text and who ...