Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings.
In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeals ruled that the order was constitutional. The California Supreme Court declined to review the case, and on April 24, 2004, Tory filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. The petition was granted, briefing followed, and the oral argument took place on March 22 ...
The California Evidence Code (abbreviated to Evid. Code in the California Style Manual) is a California code that was enacted by the California State Legislature on May 18, 1965 [1] to codify the formerly mostly common-law law of evidence. Section 351 of the Code effectively abolished any remnants of the law of evidence not explicitly included ...
In England, the Administrative Court (part of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice) now issues "quashing orders" rather than writs of certiorari. [11] In the United States, the Supreme Court of the United States grants writs of certiorari "to review questions of law or to correct errors or excesses by lower courts". [12]
Boteler v. Ingels, Director of Motor Vehicles of California: 308 U.S. 57 (1939) Black 8-0[a] none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.) affirmed United States v. Glenn L. Martin Company: 308 U.S. 62 (1939) Black 8-0[a] none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth ...
certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (3d Cir.) judgment reversed Smith v. United States: 292 U.S. 337 (1934) McReynolds 9-0 none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.) judgment affirmed Arizona v. California: 292 U.S. 341 (1934) Brandeis 9-0 none none original
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]
certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (8th Cir.) affirmed Schriber-Schroth Company v. Cleveland Trust Company: 305 U.S. 47 (1938) Stone 7-0[a] none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (6th Cir.) reversed Stahmann v. Vidal, Collector of Internal Revenue: 305 U.S. 61 (1938 ...