Ad
related to: replacement words for in conclusion- Sign-Up
Create a free account today.
Great writing, simplified.
- Free Grammar Checker
Check your grammar in seconds.
Feel confident in your writing.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Tone Detector
Your tone makes an impact,
so say it how you mean it.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Sign-Up
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
List of paradoxes. Outline of public relations – Overview of and topical guide to public relations. Map–territory relation – Relationship between an object and a representation of that object (confusing map with territory, menu with meal) Mathematical fallacy – Certain type of mistaken proof.
Deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of drawing valid inferences. An inference is valid if its conclusion follows logically from its premises, meaning that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false. For example, the inference from the premises "all men are mortal" and " Socrates is a man" to ...
Traditional account. Informal fallacies are a form of incorrect argument in natural language. [4] An argument is a series of propositions, called the premises, together with one more proposition, called the conclusion. [5][1] The premises in correct arguments offer either deductive or defeasible support for the conclusion.
Logical consequence (also entailment) is a fundamental concept in logic which describes the relationship between statements that hold true when one statement logically follows from one or more statements. A valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion is entailed by the premises, because the conclusion is the consequence of the premises.
Begging the question. In classical rhetoric and logic, begging the question or assuming the conclusion (Latin: petītiō principiī) is an informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion. Historically, begging the question refers to a fault in a dialectical argument in which the speaker assumes some ...
Contraposition. In logic and mathematics, contraposition, or transposition, refers to the inference of going from a conditional statement into its logically equivalent contrapositive, and an associated proof method known as § Proof by contrapositive. The contrapositive of a statement has its antecedent and consequent inverted and flipped.
Irrelevant conclusion. An irrelevant conclusion, [1] also known as ignoratio elenchi (Latin for 'ignoring refutation') or missing the point, is the informal fallacy of presenting an argument whose conclusion fails to address the issue in question. It falls into the broad class of relevance fallacies. [2]
Formal fallacy. In logic and philosophy, a formal fallacy[a] is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example propositional logic. [2] It is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid. The argument itself could have true premises, but still ...
Ad
related to: replacement words for in conclusion