When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gibbons v. Ogden - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbons_v._Ogden

    Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, which is granted to the US Congress by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution, encompasses the power to regulate navigation.

  3. Gibbons v. Ogden: Defining Congress’ power under the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/gibbons-v-ogden-defining...

    On March 2, 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in Gibbons v. Ogden, holding that Congress may regulate interstate commerce.

  4. Jenna Bush Hager Cries During Farewell to Hoda Kotb on the ...

    www.aol.com/jenna-bush-hager-cries-during...

    Kotb, 60, departed the morning show after 17 years on the Friday, Jan. 10, episode of the Today show. During her final episode, Bush Hager, 43, also took a moment to bid farewell to her co-host of ...

  5. The Real Reason Why Savannah Guthrie Isn't on the ‘Today’ Show

    www.aol.com/real-reason-why-savannah-guthrie...

    Ever since Savannah Guthrie joined the Today show in June 2011, fans of the NBC morning show expect her to be among the panel of co-hosts to deliver the most important news of the day. While she's ...

  6. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993) The government must show a compelling interest to pass a law that targets a religion's ritual (as opposed to a law that happens to burden the ritual but is not directed at it). Failing to show such an interest, the prohibition of animal sacrifice is a violation of the Free Exercise Clause. Rosenberger v.

  7. History of the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Supreme...

    Similarly, in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court found that the interstate commerce clause permitted Congress to regulate interstate navigation. The Marshall Court also made several decisions restraining the actions of state governments. The notion that the Supreme Court could consider appeals from state courts was established in Martin v.

  8. Leeza Gibbons Reveals the Real Reason She Left ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/leeza-gibbons-reveals-real...

    For 30 years, Rose Bowl co-host Leeza Gibbons, 67, had a near-constant presence on network television.. From 1984 to 2000, she was a correspondent and co-host of Entertainment Tonight, and the ...

  9. Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. Louisiana Board ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compagnie_Francaise_de...

    He found them as baseless as their arguments about the language of Act 192. A decade earlier, he wrote, the U.S. Supreme Court had rejected a claim that the Fourteenth Amendment changed in any way the states' police power to protect public health and safety, from what the Court had recognized in 1824's Gibbons v. Ogden. [21]