Ad
related to: supreme court copy and fee payment
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v. AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members. Under the Taft–Hartley Act of 1947, which applies to the ...
FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the FTC could make an antitrust challenge under the rule of reason against a so-called pay-for-delay agreement, also referred to as a reverse payment patent settlement. Such an agreement is one in which a drug patentee pays another ...
In the United States of America, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) authorizes the payment of attorney's fees to a prevailing party in an action against the United States absent a showing by the government that its position in the underlying litigation "was substantially justified". The Act is codified in scattered sections of the United ...
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593 U.S. ___ (2021), [1] was a U.S. Supreme Court decision related to the nature of computer code and copyright law. The dispute centered on the use of parts of the Java programming language 's application programming interfaces (APIs) and about 11,000 lines of source code, which are owned by Oracle (through ...
Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that, in a union security agreement, unions are authorized by statute to collect from non-members only those fees and dues necessary to perform its duties as a collective bargaining representative. [1] The rights identified by the Court in Communications ...
The 6-3 decision reversed a lower court's dismissal of the 2021 lawsuit by the Corner Post, located in Watford City, challenging the 2011 rule governing the amount businesses pay banks when ...
The papers would have to be filed six months in advance of voting, and the voter had to provide a copy of that certificate at the time of voting. This measure was expected to decrease the number of legal voters. [22] In the 1965 Supreme Court decision Harman v. Forssenius, the Court unanimously found such measures unconstitutional. It declared ...
At $136 a night before taxes and fees, the cost was $5,640.00. Staying at the Courtyard by Marriott, 1515 Commerce St., for the rest of the trial came out to $42,306.51. A nightly stay there was $132.