When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_U...

    Notes: · Reflects laws of states and territories, including laws which have not yet gone into effect. Does not reflect federal, tribal, or local laws. · Map does not show state legality of hemp-derived cannabinoids such as CBD or delta-8-THC, which have been legal at federal level since enactment of the 2018 Farm Bill

  3. Cannabis in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_the_United_States

    In most cases, the absence of a state law does not present a preemption conflict with a federal law. [23] The federal government criminalized marijuana under the Interstate Commerce Clause, and the application of these laws to intrastate commerce were addressed squarely by the U.S. Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, in 2005.

  4. Supremacy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause

    The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. [1] It provides that state courts are bound by, and ...

  5. Cannabis policy of the Joe Biden administration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_policy_of_the_Joe...

    The use, sale, and possession of cannabis over 0.3% delta-9-THC in the United States, despite state laws, is illegal under federal law.As a Schedule I drug under the federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970, cannabis over 0.3% delta-9-THC (legal term marijuana) is considered to have "no accepted medical use" and have a high potential for abuse and physical or psychological dependence.

  6. Gonzales v. Raich - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich

    Gonzales v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v. Raich), 545 U.S. 1 (2005), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that, under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress may criminalize the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes. [1]

  7. 1996 California Proposition 215 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_California...

    Elections in California. Proposition 215, or the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, [1] is a California law permitting the use of medical cannabis despite marijuana's lack of the normal Food and Drug Administration testing for safety and efficacy. It was enacted, on November 5, 1996, by means of the initiative process, and passed with 5,382,915 (55 ...

  8. Legal history of cannabis in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis...

    e. In the United States, increased restrictions and labeling of cannabis (legal term marijuana or marihuana) as a poison began in many states from 1906 onward, and outright prohibitions began in the 1920s. By the mid-1930s cannabis was regulated as a drug in every state, including 35 states that adopted the Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act. [1]

  9. Removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_cannabis_from...

    On December 17, 2009, Rev. Bryan A. Krumm, CNP, filed a rescheduling petition for Cannabis with the DEA arguing that "because marijuana does not have the abuse potential for placement in Schedule I of the CSA, and because marijuana now has accepted medical use in 13 states, and because the DEA's own Administrative Law Judge has already ...