When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Poe v. Ullman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe_v._Ullman

    Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case, seeking pre-enforcement review, that held in the majority that plaintiffs (because the law had never been enforced) lacked standing to challenge a Connecticut law that banned the use of contraceptives and banned doctors from advising their use.

  3. Connecticut General Statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_General_Statutes

    The Connecticut General Statutes, also called the General Statutes of Connecticut and abbreviated Conn. Gen. Stat., is a codification of the law of Connecticut.Revised to 2017, it contains all of the public acts of Connecticut and certain special acts of the public nature, the Constitution of the United States, the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of ...

  4. Connecticut v. Doehr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_v._Doehr

    Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action without prior notice or hearing, a showing of extraordinary circumstances, or a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth ...

  5. Sick of being followed too close? Here’s how NC law ...

    www.aol.com/news/sick-being-followed-too-close...

    Tailgating was a contributing factor in more than 4,500 crashes in North Carolina in 2023.

  6. Estelle Griswold - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estelle_Griswold

    Griswold and Buxton had intended only to change the statute so that married women could seek contraception for medical purposes. However, in a 5–4 ruling issued on June 20, 1961, the Court upheld the Connecticut statute, declaring that the law had never been enforced and the consequence of its violation was not harmful and so was constitutional.

  7. The Genius Hack That Turns a Freezer Staple Into Perfect ...

    www.aol.com/genius-hack-turns-freezer-staple...

    You don't want them too thin or they'll become more potato chip than pancake—aim for about 1/2-inch thick. Then fry them a second time to get them that picture-perfect golden brown color.

  8. Trump claims jury misconduct in latest attempt to discredit ...

    www.aol.com/trump-claims-jury-misconduct-latest...

    Trump's lawyers, citing presidential immunity and other ongoing litigation, told Merchan they oppose a hearing examining their claims of juror misconduct, and instead asked the judge to weigh the ...

  9. House Bill 5414 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Bill_5414

    House Bill 5414, passed by the Connecticut General Assembly and signed into law by that U.S. state's Governor, Ned Lamont, on May 5, 2022, as the Reproductive Freedom Defense Act, [1] [2] is intended to protect abortion in the state and expand the procedure's availability.