When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Prior-appropriation water rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior-appropriation_water...

    Water is very scarce in the West and so must be allocated sparingly, based on the productivity of its use. The prior appropriation doctrine developed in the Western United States from Spanish (and later Mexican) civil law and differs from the riparian water rights that apply in the rest of the United States.

  3. Water law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_law_in_the_United_States

    A variety of federal, state, and local laws govern water rights. One issue unique to America is the law of water with respect to American Indians. Tribal water rights are a special case because they fall under neither the riparian system nor the appropriation system but are outlined in the Winters v. United States decision. Indian water rights ...

  4. Riparian water rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riparian_water_rights

    Riparian water rights (or simply riparian rights) is a system for allocating water among those who possess land along its path. It has its origins in English common law . Riparian water rights exist in many jurisdictions with a common law heritage, such as Canada , Australia , New Zealand , and states in the eastern United States .

  5. Lux v. Haggin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lux_v._Haggin

    These two systems of water rights were at odds with one another. [2] [3] Appropriative water rights granted the first to claim the water's use complete rights to it. Riparian water rights established that use of the water was an uncontested right that came with the land and did not have to be shared with non-riparian land owners. The case of Lux v.

  6. Arizona v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._California

    Since then, the case has been relitigated several times because of Arizona's claims that California is using more water than it is entitled to. The court determined that the Secretary of the Interior was not bound by Prior-appropriation water rights in allocating water among the states, within the 1964 decree. [1]

  7. Water resources law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_resources_law

    The human right to water has been recognized in international law through a wide range of international documents, including international human rights treaties, declarations and other standards. Additionally, the United Nations passed a resolution stating that the member states "recognizes the right to safe and clean drinking water and ...

  8. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivers_and_Harbors_Act_of_1899

    The Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 is the oldest federal environmental law in the United States. [1] The Act makes it a misdemeanor to discharge refuse matter of any kind into the navigable waters , or tributaries thereof, of the United States without a permit; this specific provision is known as the Refuse Act .

  9. Wyoming v. Colorado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyoming_v._Colorado

    Case history; Prior: In equity. Subsequent: Petition for rehearing granted October 9, 1922, 260 U.S. 1.Motion to dismiss denied May 31, 1932, 286 U.S. 494. Holding; Colorado could divert a limited amount of water from an interstate stream system as long as it did not interfere with Wyoming's previously established (prior appropriation) right to the same stream system.