When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Obtain peer review comments

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obtain_peer...

    Make it as good as you can. No one wants to review half-done work, even in peer review. This does not mean that no one will review your C-Class article, but if someone has an article which is just shy of featured status, more experienced editors would like to review that instead.

  3. Wikipedia:Peer review/Guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/...

    Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).

  4. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

    Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on.

  5. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Peer review in writing is a pivotal component among various peer review mechanisms, often spearheaded by educators and involving student participation, particularly in academic settings. It constitutes a fundamental process in academic and professional writing, serving as a systematic means to ensure the quality, effectiveness, and credibility ...

  6. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Peer review in scientific journals assumes that the article reviewed has been honestly prepared. The process occasionally detects fraud, but is not designed to do so. [204] When peer review fails and a paper is published with fraudulent or otherwise irreproducible data, the paper may be retracted. A 1998 experiment on peer review with a ...

  7. Clinical peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_peer_review

    Clinical peer review, also known as medical peer review is the process by which health care professionals, including those in nursing and pharmacy, evaluate each other's clinical performance. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] A discipline-specific process may be referenced accordingly (e.g., physician peer review , nursing peer review ).

  8. Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dashboard.wikiedu...

    A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting

  9. Peer feedback - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_feedback

    Peer feedback is a practice where feedback is given by one student to another. Peer feedback provides students opportunities to learn from each other. After students finish a writing assignment but before the assignment is handed in to the instructor for a grade, the students have to work together to check each other's work and give comments to the peer partner.