When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: court interpreting proper protocols for medical treatment of people

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Standard of care - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_of_care

    A standard of care is a medical or psychological treatment guideline, and can be general or specific. It specifies appropriate treatment based on scientific evidence and collaboration between medical and/or psychological professionals involved in the treatment of a given condition. Some common examples:

  3. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolam_v_Friern_Hospital...

    The Bolam principle addresses the first element and may be formulated as a rule that a doctor, nurse or other health professional is not negligent if he or she acts in accordance with a practice accepted at the time as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion, even though some other practitioners adopt a different practice.

  4. Patients' rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patients'_rights

    A patient's bill of rights is a list of guarantees for those receiving medical care. It may take the form of a law or a non-binding declaration. Typically a patient's bill of rights guarantees patients information, fair treatment, and autonomy over medical decisions, among other rights.

  5. Estelle v. Gamble - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estelle_v._Gamble

    The Supreme Court in 1993 extended the requirement that inmates receive required medical care beyond what it established in Estelle. In Helling v. McKinney, the Court considered the case of a Nevada prisoner, "the cellmate of a five-pack-a-day smoker," who sought to be housed in an environment free of second-hand smoke. McKinney suffered from ...

  6. Medical law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_law

    Medical law is the branch of law which concerns the prerogatives and responsibilities of medical professionals and the rights of the patient. [1] It should not be confused with medical jurisprudence , which is a branch of medicine , rather than a branch of law .

  7. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_v_Lanarkshire...

    87. The correct position, in relation to the risks of injury involved in treatment, can now be seen to be substantially that adopted in Sidaway by Lord Scarman, and by Lord Woolf MR in Pearce, subject to the refinement made by the High Court of Australia in Rogers v Whitaker, which we have discussed at paras 77-73. An adult person of sound mind ...

  8. Dying To Be Free - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/dying-to-be-free...

    Of the 74, 53 had some experience with 12-step or abstinence-based treatment. Their involvement in such programs ran the gamut from multiple long-term residential and detox stays to outpatient treatment and court-ordered attendance at Narcotics Anonymous meetings. These were addicts who wanted to stop using, or at least heard the message.

  9. Medical malpractice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice_in_the...

    Failure to diagnose: a medical professional is alleged to have failed to diagnose an existing medical condition, or to have provided an incorrect diagnoses for the patient's medical condition. Negligent treatment: a medical professional is alleged to have made a mistake that a reasonably competent professional in the same position would not ...