When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Originalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Originalism

    Originalism is a legal theory that bases constitutional, judicial, and statutory interpretation of text on the original understanding at the time of its adoption. Proponents of the theory object to judicial activism and other interpretations related to a living constitution framework.

  3. Original intent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_intent

    Original intent is a theory in law concerning constitutional and statutory interpretation. It is frequently used as a synonym for originalism; while original intent is one theory in the originalist family, it has some salient differences which has led originalists from more predominant schools of thought such as original meaning to distinguish original intent as much as legal realists do.

  4. Judicial activism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism

    Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of their decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint . [ 1 ]

  5. Textualism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textualism

    Textualism is a formalist theory in which the interpretation of the law is based exclusively on the ordinary meaning of the legal text, where no consideration is given to non-textual sources, such as intention of the law when passed, the problem it was intended to remedy, or significant questions regarding the justice or rectitude of the law.

  6. Big Data Meets the Constitution in New Originalism Project - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/big-data-meets-constitution...

    Georgia appellate judges evaluate cutting-edge inquiries into what the Constitution's framers meant from Georgia State University law students.

  7. Legal formalism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_formalism

    Legal formalism is both a descriptive and normative theory of how judges should decide cases. [1] In its descriptive sense, formalists maintain that judges reach their decisions by applying uncontroversial principles to the facts; formalists believe that there is an underlying logic to the many legal principles that may be applied in different cases.

  8. Opinion: What Ohio Issue 1 proposes is the very definition of ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-ohio-issue-1-proposes...

    I care less whether fair maps are done by "politicians" or by "citizens" − but it surely will not happen if Issue 1 passes.

  9. Constitution of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Ohio

    Voters also rejected a proposal to strike the word "white" from the 1851 Constitution's definition of voter eligibility. Although black people could vote in all State and Federal elections in Ohio due to the Fifteenth Amendment, the text of the State Constitution was not changed until 1923. [7] Urban voters propelled most the amendments to passage.