When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: organizational and distributive justice

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Organizational justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_justice

    Four components of organizational justice are distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Research also suggests the importance of affect and emotion in the appraisal of the fairness of a situation as well as one's behavioral and attitudinal reactions to the situation. [3]

  3. Distributive justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_justice

    In social psychology, distributive justice is defined as perceived fairness of how rewards and costs are shared by (distributed across) group members. [2] For example, when some workers work more hours but receive the same pay, group members may feel that distributive justice has not occurred.

  4. Fairness dilemmas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_dilemmas

    There are five types of distributive norms that help in maintaining distributive justice. Equity : this is where members' outcomes are based on their inputs to the group effort. Someone who has given more time, money, energy, risk, or other input, should receive more than someone who has contributed less.

  5. Interactional justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactional_justice

    Interactional justice, a subcomponent of organizational justice, has come to be seen as consisting of two specific types of interpersonal treatment (e.g. Greenberg, 1990a, 1993b). The first labeled interpersonal justice, reflects the degree to which people are treated with politeness, dignity, and respect by authorities or third parties ...

  6. Justice as Fairness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_as_Fairness

    Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical" is an essay by John Rawls, published in 1985. [1] In it he describes his conception of justice. It comprises two main principles of liberty and equality; the second is subdivided into fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle .

  7. Spheres of Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheres_of_Justice

    Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice (1971). According to Walzer, each sphere has its own internal logic and should be governed ...

  8. A Theory of Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Theory_of_Justice

    A Theory of Justice is a 1971 work of political philosophy and ethics by the philosopher John Rawls (1921–2002) in which the author attempts to provide a moral theory alternative to utilitarianism and that addresses the problem of distributive justice (the socially just distribution of goods in a society).

  9. Equity theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equity_theory

    These perceptions of inequity are perceptions of organizational justice, or more specifically, injustice. [citation needed] Subsequently, the theory has wide-reaching implications for employee morale, efficiency, productivity, and turnover. [citation needed] Equity theory has also been applied to intimate relationships.