Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Laissez-faire is French for "Let them do (what they want)". [4] This style is the least active way of leading people. This leadership style can be seen as the absence of leadership, and is characterized by an attitude avoiding any responsibility. Decision-making is left to the employees themselves, and no rules are fixed.
This leadership style has been associated with lower productivity than both autocratic and democratic styles of leadership and with lower group member satisfaction than democratic leadership. [9] Some researchers have suggested that laissez-faire leadership can actually be considered non-leadership or leadership avoidance. [18]
The advantages of the Laissez faire are increased innovation and creativity through the autonomy of expert staff. Some examples of this type of employee are teachers, creatives, and designers. [4] Disadvantages include the risk of low productivity by unsupervised staff, loss of direction due to the hands-off style of management. [1]
Laissez-faire (/ ˌ l ɛ s eɪ ˈ f ɛər / LESS-ay-FAIR, from French: laissez faire [lɛse fɛːʁ] ⓘ, lit. ' let do ' ) is a type of economic system in which transactions between private groups of people are free from any form of economic interventionism (such as subsidies or regulations ).
Laissez-faire leadership should not be confused with delegation of responsibilities, which is often associated with positive leadership; the main distinction of the laissez-faire style is an abdication of responsibility for the outcome when decisions are made by subordinates in the absence of managerial oversight.
The authoritarian leadership style, for example, is approved in periods of crisis but fails to win the "hearts and minds" of followers in day-to-day management; the democratic leadership style is more adequate in situations that require consensus building; finally, the laissez-faire leadership style is appreciated for the degree of freedom it ...
Lewin often characterized organizational management styles and cultures in terms of leadership climates defined by [13] (1) authoritarian, (2) democratic and (3) laissez-faire work environments. He is often confused with McGregor with his work environments, but McGregor adapted them directly to leadership-theory.
Laissez-faire leadership indicates a lack of leadership and a complete hands-off approach with employees. [ 13 ] With transactional leadership being applied to the lower-level needs and being more managerial in style, it is a foundation for transformational leadership which applies to higher-level needs.