Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The identity needs of all sides are brought to the forefront with the goal of getting "the disputants to move from positional bargaining to interest-based approaches." [ 19 ] [ 20 ] Rothman and Olson suggest that the parties should now engage in a "deep dialogue" to give a voice and structure to the underlying needs of the various parties.
Third, the bargaining model assumes that war ends when a settlement is reached, yet the Iraq War demonstrates that it is hard to impose one's will on a defeated opponent. Fourth, both the Bush administration and the Saddam regime demonstrated cognitive and decision-making biases (the bargaining model assumes that actors behave rationally). [15]
Strikebreakers threaten that goal and undermine the union's bargaining position, and occasionally this erupts into violent confrontation, with violence committed either by, or against, strikers. [1] Some who have sought to explain such violence observe, if labor disputes are accompanied by violence, it may be because labor has no legal redress ...
[52] [53] These five strategies have been frequently described in the literature and are based on the dual-concern model. [54] The dual-concern model of conflict resolution is a perspective that assumes individuals' preferred method of dealing with conflict is based on two themes or dimensions: [55] A concern for self (i.e., assertiveness), and
It is the most widely studied model of one's opponent. [13] A state is presumed to be implacably hostile, and contra-indicators of this are ignored. They are dismissed as propaganda ploys or signs of weakness. Examples are John Foster Dulles’ position regarding the Soviet Union, or Israel's initial position on the Palestine Liberation ...
The book begins with a chapter "Don't Bargain Over Positions" that explains the undesirable characteristics of positional bargaining, in which the negotiating parties argue over a sequence of positions. Such an argument "produces unwise outcomes", "is inefficient", and "endangers an ongoing relationship". [3]: 4–7
Models of escalation in conflicts are the Friedrich Glasl's model of conflict escalation, [2] the conflict curve by Michael S. Lund [25] [26] [27] and the hourglass model by Oliver Ramsbotham. [ 25 ] [ 28 ] When an escalation is initiated by one party there often is a sequence of escalation behaviour: requests , demands , angry remarks ...
Blau (1964), [6] and Emerson (1976) [7] were the key theorists who developed the original theories of social exchange. Social exchange theory approaches bargaining power from a sociological perspective, suggesting that power dynamics in negotiations are influenced by the value of the resources each party brings to the exchange (a cost-benefit analysis), as well as the level of dependency ...