When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. 1964 California Proposition 14 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1964_California_Proposition_14

   The California Real Estate Association also supported California Proposition 10 on the November 1950 election ballot (adding Article 34 to the California Constitution and known as the "Public Housing Project Law") which made it significantly more difficult to build low-rent housing projects in California communities. [13]

3. California Department of Real Estate - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Department_of...

   Chika Sunquist was appointed Commissioner of the California Department of Real Estate (DRE) by Governor Gavin Newsom on November 28, 2023, and she assumed office on January 3, 2024. [5] Real estate licensing is subject to both the Real Estate Law and the Regulations of the Commissioner, which have the force and effect of law.

4. California Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Bureau_of_Real...

   BREA is responsible for the accreditation of educational courses and providers for real estate appraisers and has reviewed and approved over 1,800 pre-licensing and continuing education courses. [1] In addition to the real estate appraisal related courses offered by the community college, University of California, and California State ...

5. 1978 California Proposition 13 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_California_Proposition_13

   Proposition 13 is not the only law in California designed to prevent tax-induced displacement. The California Tax Postponement Program, passed in 1977, ensures that “homeowners who are seniors, are blind, or have a disability to defer current-year property taxes on their principal residence if they meet certain criteria”. [11]

6. Unruh Civil Rights Act - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_Civil_Rights_Act

   The California Supreme Court has repeatedly "interpreted the [law] as protecting classes other than those listed on its face". [6] For example, even prior to the 2005 addition of sexual orientation to the law's list of covered classes, the Unruh Act had been "construed as protecting gays and lesbians from arbitrary discrimination", [6] such as in the case of Rolon v.

7. Reitman v. Mulkey - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reitman_v._Mulkey

   Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that held that a state could not authorize invidious discrimination by private landlords without entangling itself in the ensuing discriminatory private decisions.