When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    Qui facit per alium facit per se (anglicised Late Latin), [1] which means "He who acts through another does the act himself", is a fundamental legal maxim of the law of agency. [2] It is a maxim often stated in discussing the liability of employer for the act of employee in terms of vicarious liability."

  3. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  4. Vicarious liability in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in...

    Vicarious liability in English law is a doctrine of English tort law that imposes strict liability on employers for the wrongdoings of their employees. Generally, an employer will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting their duties. [ 1 ]

  5. Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viasystems_(Tyneside)_Ltd...

    May LJ noted that Prof Atiyah Vicarious Liability in the Law of Torts (1967) 156 in a chapter called ‘The Borrowed Servant’ suggested that both the general and temporary employer could be considered vicariously liable. After reviewing the history and noting that different jurisdictions diverged (Pennsylvania though in particular allows dual ...

  6. Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lister_v_Hesley_Hall_Ltd

    Vicarious liability, course of employment, close connection Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001] UKHL 22 is an English tort law case, creating a new precedent for finding where an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of their employees.

  7. Mattis v Pollock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattis_v_Pollock

    Vicarious liability, course of employment, close connection Mattis v Pollock [2003] 1 WLR 2158 is an English tort law case, establishing an employer's vicarious liability for assault , even where it may be intentional or pre-meditated.

  8. Legal liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_liability

    In law, liable means "responsible or answerable in law; legally obligated". [1] Legal liability concerns both civil law and criminal law and can arise from various areas of law, such as contracts, torts, taxes, or fines given by government agencies. The claimant is the one who seeks to establish, or prove, liability.

  9. Category:English vicarious liability case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:English_vicarious...

    This page was last edited on 6 December 2014, at 07:10 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.