Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. is a case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The case concerns the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and personal jurisdiction. [1] [2] The case has not yet been set for argument as of October 10, 2024. [3]
On Nov. 12, Judge Merchan plans to issue a ruling on Trump's motion to throw out the case because of the Supreme Court's recent ruling granting him immunity from criminal prosecution for official ...
Republican Donald Trump's return to the presidency is expected to precipitate a shift in the U.S. government's legal stance in major cases pending at the Supreme Court, including a closely watched ...
These remaining two lawsuits were dismissed without comment by the Supreme Court on February 22, 2021. [103] On April 19, 2021, more than five months after the November 3, 2020, election, the Supreme Court declined to hear the outstanding case brought by former Republican congressional candidate Jim Bognet, dismissing it without comment. [104]
Nigel Farage has claimed that senior members of Donald Trump's incoming cabinet are "horrified" at Sir Keir Starmer's plans to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. The prime minister and ...
In response, Smith filed his own brief on February 14, 2024, urging the Supreme Court to deny Trump's request and citing the urgency of the pending 2024 presidential election. Smith also requested that if the Supreme Court took the case, to treat Trump's request as a petition for writ of certiorari, and put the case on an expedited schedule. [39]
A: Final tallies are still coming in, and polls do come with margins of error, but this is the third presidential election in which many pollsters appear to have underestimated Donald Trump's ...
The Supreme Court consolidated the case with Trump v. Mazars. [6] Trump v. Vance – In July 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7–2 that the State of New York could issue a grand-jury subpoena of the President's financial records. The request was determined not to violate Article II or the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.