Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Mark 16:9-20 as Forgery or Fabrication A detailed case against Mark 16:9–20, including all relevant stylistic, textual, manuscript, and patristic evidence, and an extensive bibliography. Mark 16 King James Bible - Wikisource; English Translation with Parallel Latin Vulgate Archived 2020-09-22 at the Wayback Machine
The stylistic differences suggest that none of these was written by the author of the Gospel of St. Mark. Metzger speaks of the "inconcinnities" between the first 8 verses of chapter 16 and the longer ending, and suggests, "all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with verse 8 ...
Section 13.1 is completely useless and so should be deleted. It simply restates what the other says earlier -- that scholars think Mark 16:9-20 is added, but just in a much longer space. It also has some fringe views about the ending being authentic from Craig Evans. Totally useless, hard to read, redundant.
For example, many versions of the Bible specifically point out that the most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses did not include Mark 16:9–20, i.e., the Gospel of Mark originally ended at Mark 16:8, and additional verses were added a few hundred years later. This is known as the "Markan Appendix".
Mark 16:9-20 or the longer ending of Mark is a variant found within the Textus Receptus which has generally been assumed to have been a later addition into the text by modern textual critics. [110] The earliest extant complete manuscripts of Mark, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus , two 4th-century manuscripts, do not contain the last twelve ...
Compare Matthew 3:12; Luke 3:16. [13] ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ καὶ πυρί (with the Holy Spirit and fire) – P 1195 1241 ℓ 44m syr h*. [13] Compare Matthew 3:12; Luke 3:16. [13] Mark 1:13 καὶ ἦν ἐν τῇ ερημω (he was in the wilderness) – א A B D L Θ 33. 579. 892. 1342.
A young man in a robe also appears in Mark 16:5–7. Mark does not name the High Priest. [114] Witness testimony against Jesus does not agree. [115] The cock crows "twice" as predicted. [116] See also Fayyum Fragment. The other Gospels simply record, "the cock crew". Early codices 01, W, and most Western texts have the simpler version. [117]
Mark 9:46 [21]: 121 Mark 11:26 [21]: 128 Mark 15:28 [21]: 144 The end of Mark in Vaticanus contains an empty column after Verse 16:8, possibly suggesting that the scribe was aware of the missing ending. It is the only empty New Testament column in the Codex. [22]: 252 Mark 16:9–20 — The Book of Mark ends with verse 16:8.