Ad
related to: antonym for fact check
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
According to the Poynter Institute, there are four categories of false fact-checking websites: Sites that are satirical in nature; Sites that attempt to subvert serious fact-checking sites; Sites that re-appropriate the term "fact-check" for partisan political causes; Sites with more violent intentions, such as genocide denial. [80]
Fact-checking websites in China often avoid commenting on political, economic, and other current affairs. [45] Several Chinese fact-checking websites have been criticized for lack of transparency with regard to their methodology and sources, and for following Chinese propaganda. [46]
Fact-checking can be conducted before or after the text or content is published or otherwise disseminated. Internal fact-checking is such checking done in-house by the publisher to prevent inaccurate content from being published; when the text is analyzed by a third party, the process is called external fact-checking. [1]
Pages in category "Fact-checking websites" The following 45 pages are in this category, out of 45 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ...
Since November 2014, FactCheck.org has published twenty-eight pages of articles checking the facts on the many 2016 presidential candidates. [18] As of April 2016, the five remaining candidates had dedicated archives to their fact-checked claims. In 2016, FactCheck.org became a fact-checking partner of Facebook. [3] [19]
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [1] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets, [2] [3] relying on a self-described "combination of objective measures and subjective analysis".
Fact checks of fake news were rarely seen by consumers, [201] [202] with none of those who saw a fake news story being reached by a related fact check. [203] Brendan Nyhan, one of the researchers, emphatically stated in an interview on NBC News: "People got vastly more misinformation from Donald Trump than they did from fake news websites ...
Even though many satirical sources are labeled as such with disclaimers, there is a long history of satirical content being falsely perceived as true. [1] According to Snopes, this misunderstanding can be due to a variety of reasons: